(Sections 264 & 264.1) Criminal Harassment and Uttering Threats in Canada: What You Need to Know

Facing allegations of criminal harassment or uttering threats can turn your life upside down. Even in emotionally charged situation, like a breakup or a heated disagreement, these charges can carry serious legal consequences, including jail time, a criminal record, and restrictions such as no-contact orders. Here’s a clear, up-to-date guide to help you understand what’s at stake under Criminal Code sections 264 and 264.1.

1. Understanding Criminal Harassment (s. 264)

Criminal harassment, commonly referred to as stalking, does not require physical harm. It’s defined by repeated behaviors that cause someone to reasonably fear for their safety or the safety of a loved one.

Under s. 264(1-2), prohibited conduct includes:

  • Threatening conduct directed at them or their family.
  • Repeatedly following a person or someone they know.
  • Repeated communications, including texts, calls, or social media, either directly or through third parties.
  • Watching or besetting someone’s home, work, or frequented places.
  • Threatening conduct directed at them or their family..


To prosecute, the Crown must prove:

  • You engaged in one of the listed behaviours.
  • You knew, or were reckless to the possibility, that it caused fear.
  • That fear was objectively reasonable under the circumstances.

Penalties

  • Indictable offence: up to 10 years in prison.
  • Summary process: up to 2 years less a day.

2. What It Means to Utter Threats (s. 264.1)

Uttering threats occurs when someone knowingly conveys a threat to another person, either directly or indirectly.

Section 264.1(1) covers threats to:

  • Cause death or bodily harm.
  • Burn, destroy, or damage real or personal property.
  • Kill, poison, or injure an animal or bird.


Whether spoken, written, gestured, or shared through intermediaries, the form doesn’t matter, intent that the recipient take it seriously is sufficient.

Penalties

  • (a) Threats to persons: indictable max 5 years, or summary offence.
  • (b) & (c) Threats to property/animals: indictable max 2 years, or summary.

3. Domestic Context

When these offences arise within a domestic or intimate-partner context, the legal consequences intensify:

  • Once charges are laid, they cannot be withdrawn purely because the complainant changes their mind. Mandatory charging applies when there are reasonable grounds, even if the relationship changes. Decisions rest with Crown prosecutors, not individuals.
  • No-contact bail conditions are routinely imposed, potentially requiring separation from shared residences and restrictions on contact.
  • In appropriate circumstances variations of no-contact orders can be sought with the consent of the Crown.

4. Resolution Options Available

Even if charges are lodged, resolutions without trial are possible:

  • Withdrawal: In appropriate cases, charges can be withdrawn where there is no prospect of convictions, or where it is not in the public interest for the Crown to proceed.
  • Peace Bonds (s. 810): You may agree to conditions (like no contact) for 12 months in exchange for no conviction.
  • Diversion Programs: In select cases, completion of counselling or community service may prevent a conviction.
  • Plea negotiations: Reduce the charge or secure a lighter sentence in exchange for a guilty plea.

5. Real-World Impacts

A conviction in these areas can have far-reaching consequences:

AreaPotential Impact
EmploymentConvictions appear on background checks; professions like teaching or healthcare often have strict standards.
ImmigrationMay lead to deportation, loss of status, or inadmissibility.
Family LawAffects child custody/access decisions; child protection agencies may become involved.
TravelU.S. and other countries may deny entry, evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

6. Building an Effective Defence

Common defence strategies include:

  • Challenging reasonable fear: Arguing that a reasonable person wouldn’t have felt threatened.
  • Contextualizing conduct: Showing messages or actions were benign or misunderstood.
  • Intent: Arguing you lacked the intent for the recipient to take the conduct seriously.
  • Charter violations: If your rights were breached during arrest or investigation, key evidence may be excluded.

Take Action Now: Protect Your Rights

If you’re facing charges under ss. 264 or 264.1 in Toronto:

  • Immediately cut all contact with the complainant.
  • Follow your bail conditions strictly.
  • Seek a Toronto criminal defence lawyer before making any statements.
  • Consider proactive steps like counselling to bolster your case.


Karapancev Law – Criminal Lawyers Toronto provides experienced criminal defence for harassment and threats throughout the Greater Toronto Area, helping clients obtain charge withdrawals, peace bonds, and acquittals.

Don’t face this alone. Contact Karapancev Law now for a free confidential consultation.

Karapancev Law – Criminal Lawyers Toronto

Picture of Alexander Karapancev

Alexander Karapancev

Alexander Karapancev is a Toronto criminal lawyer practicing throughout the province of Ontario. He regularly serves as lead trial counsel on serious and complex criminal cases. He is the founder of Karapancev Law, a law firm representing clients facing criminal charges, regulatory offences, and professional discipline proceedings.

Mr. Karapancev has acted as counsel in hundreds of cases throughout the province of Ontario, regularly representing clients at trials, applications, bail hearings and preliminary inquiries. He is regularly retained to defend individuals charged with serious allegations of fraud, drug trafficking, DUI offences, domestic assault, and sexual assault. Prior to founding his law firm, Mr. Karapancev practiced criminal defence at a boutique Toronto law firm and also served as a per diem Crown prosecutor.

Top Rated Toronto Criminal Defence Lawyers

Results matter. A reputation built on winning. Karapancev Law Is Ready to Fight for You!