Criminal Lawyer Brampton
If you have been charged with a criminal offence in Brampton or anywhere in Peel Region, Karapancev Law can help. Our criminal defence team represents clients facing charges across the GTA from our office in downtown Toronto, and we regularly handle matters in Brampton. Call (416) 613-9984 for a free, confidential consultation.
Defending Criminal Charges in Brampton
Brampton is one of the fastest-growing cities in Ontario and has one of the highest volumes of criminal cases in the province. Charges here span the full range, impaired driving, domestic assault, drug trafficking, fraud, sexual assault, and serious violent offences. The stakes are the same regardless of where in Ontario you are charged: your freedom, your career, and your future are on the line.
Our founder, Alexander Karapancev, has conducted hundreds of trials across Ontario. He holds a Master of Laws from Osgoode Hall Law School, previously served as a per diem Crown prosecutor, and sits on the Executive Board of the Ontario Bar Association’s Criminal Justice Section. He is regularly consulted by CBC, CTV, CP24, and the Toronto Star for expert commentary on criminal cases. When you are facing criminal charges in Brampton, what matters is the quality of your defence, not the location of your lawyer’s office.
Charges We Defend in Brampton
We defend Brampton clients facing charges including DUI and impaired driving, domestic assault, sexual assault, drug possession and trafficking, assault and violent crimes, fraud and theft, firearms and weapons offences, bail hearings, and regulatory and other offences.
Get Help Now
Featured in the News
Recent Cases
R. v. H.Y.: The client was charged with domestic assault allegations. All charges dismissed at trial.
In a domestic assault trial in Toronto, the Crown adduced witness evidence about the complainant having alleged injuries following the incident.. The defence’s theory was that the complainant was the aggressor and that any injuries were the result of self-defence. The cross-examination of the complainant uncovered many inconsistencies, and the crown asked the charges be dismissed.
R. v. S.L.: The client was accused of assault with a weapon.
It was alleged that she encountered a former partner walking on the road and hit him with her car. It was alleged that she then hit him a second time with the car. It was the defence position that the client was innocent and numerous pre-trials were conducted. Ultimately the charge was withdrawn.
R. v. T.N.: The client was charged with sexual assault, sexual interference, and breaching his bail.
The client was charged with sexual assault and sexual interference and a breach of bail charge. The sexual offences were related to allegations made by a former friend of the client. It was the defence position that the complainant was lying and had a motive to do so. The matter was scheduled for a preliminary hearing. Over several days of testimony, the defence was able to secure testimony that the Complainant lied to the police and her mother. Further, the defence was able to elicit testimony from the complainant’s friend that she coached her to lie to the police on her behalf. At the conclusion of the preliminary hearing, the sexual assault and sexual interference charges were withdrawn.
R. v. I.D. : The client was charged with cocaine and fentanyl possession for the purpose of trafficking following a police investigation in Milton.
He was discovered in a car with a large amount of drugs in the trunk. Following a thorough examination of the disclosure, a number of major concerns emerged. The prosecution dropped all charges after continuing negotiations.
